Post image for Misconceptions Considered: State Recognition and Masters-Level Entry

Misconceptions Considered: State Recognition and Masters-Level Entry

by Kimberly on April 11, 2012 · 8 comments

If you’re a music therapist–student, intern, or professional–chances are you have heard that the American Music Therapy Association (AMTA) is considering a move to make music therapy a Masters-level entry field. This process includes committee reports, opportunities for member comment, townhall meetings at the regional conferences…lots of opportunities for music therapists to share their thoughts, opinions, and questions on the matter.

I have some fellow music therapy bloggers and friends who have written on this topic, but I myself have gone back and forth about it. I had originally intended not to share any thoughts. But I changed my mind recently when reading information on some Facebook threads about the connection between Master’s level entry, state recognition, and reimbursement.

But first…some disclaimers…I am not writing today as a spokesperson for CBMT. However, I am writing based on my experiences and what I have learned working in regulatory affairs.

I am also not going to weigh in on whether I think the profession should move to Masters level entry or not. I am simply going to try and clarify some misunderstandings about the connection between Masters level entry, state recognition, and reimbursement.

Now that that’s out of the way…what I’ve been reading and hearing about is the idea that becoming a Master’s-level entry profession will help with our state recognition efforts and will help us get reimbursement for music therapy services. In my experience, that’s simply not true.

Our state recognition efforts are seeking to get our profession recognized as is, with our established and evolving educational, clinical training, and board certification requirements. It is not dependent on having a grad degree. Just ask the music therapists in Nevada and North Dakota.

What makes our state recognition efforts work is the blood, sweat, and tears of the amazing state music therapists who are pounding the pavement, talking to their state legislators and agency officials, spending time at their state capitol, testifying at hearings, emailing and making phone calls, and passing our flyers.

A grad degree does not matter for state recognition. What matters is the quality work we do, the difference we make in people’s lives, and the grassroots networking and advocacy that happens.

In addition, having a Master’s degree does not impact reimbursement success. Waivers and 3rd party reimbursements apply to the goals we address, independent of whether we have a graduate degree or not. What likely will impact reimbursement success is state recognition…and, well, you’ve already heard my thoughts about the link between Master’s level entry and state recognition.

There is a lot to consider in this possible move and I am encouraged by the dialogue, questions, and comments I am hearing and reading. It seems to me to be a very healthy dialogue to have as we consider the possibilities for the future of music therapy.

If you have any questions or comments of your own to share, I invite and welcome you to share them in the comments section below or, if you’d rather not be so public, feel free to email me: ksmoore@cbmt.org

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

Rachelle Norman April 12, 2012 at 8:02 am

Thank you, Kimberly, for explaining how education level affects our state recognition efforts. There are many arguments to consider on both sides of this debate, and it helps to have clarity on one of them from you, who has been so involved with the recognition efforts across the country.

Ashley Romain April 16, 2012 at 9:45 pm

I always thought that there’s really no difference between master’s level entry and state recognition. Glad you posted about it. Well said. Thanks!

Antoinette Morrison April 17, 2012 at 7:55 pm

Thank you so much for posting this! I agree with you, the quality of work we do will make the biggest difference! Thank you so much for your perspective!

Simone April 18, 2012 at 3:59 pm

Hello! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading through this post reminds me of my good old room mate! He always kept chatting about this. I will forward this page to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Many thanks for sharing!

Dana April 18, 2012 at 4:10 pm

Hi there, simply turned into alert to your weblog through Google, and found that it is truly informative. I am gonna be careful for brussels. I’ll appreciate when you proceed this in future. A lot of other folks will probably be benefited out of your writing. Cheers!

Kimberly April 19, 2012 at 8:32 pm

Thank you Dana and Simone! ~Kimberly

Kimberly April 19, 2012 at 8:36 pm

Thanks Ashley and Rachelle! ~Kimberly

learn online music July 27, 2012 at 3:56 am

Your post seems to be very awesome.I enjoyed it while reading.I’m glad that you simply shared this helpful info with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thank you for sharing.

Previous post:

Next post: