Post image for Am I a Therapist First or a Musician?

Am I a Therapist First or a Musician?

by Kimberly on July 20, 2015 · 6 comments

I’m two-thirds of the way through reading Ken Aigen’s 2013 book The Study of Music Therapy: Current Issues and Concepts. It’s been sitting on my shelf for almost a year, now, as I made myself focus solely on chipping away at my dissertation and completing first year of teaching. Now that both of those are checked off the proverbial to-do list, it’s  time to dust off the non-dissertation-related literature…

Aigen’s text is thought-provoking and is providing me with a deeper understanding of areas of practice in which I have a superficial understanding—music-centered practice, Community Music Therapy, psychoanalytic views, etc. Although I don’t agree with all his points (fodder for future posts, perhaps), his arguments are provocative and stimulating for those interested in more theoretical and philosophical discourse (a perfect space in which to be for this newly minted PhD).

I told myself I wouldn’t blog about his book until I had read it in its entirety, but inspiration struck this morning, so the writing must follow.

Early in the book, Aigen explores the identity of the music therapist and asks the reader to consider whether he or she works as a “musician who does therapy” or a “therapist who uses music” (pg. 30). In other words, are you a musician first, or a therapist?

When I first read the chapter, I thought to myself that I am the therapist who uses music. Why? Well, I’ve had plenty of clinical experiences in which this has been true. Take rehabilitation, for example. I this context I commonly “use music” as a stimulus for entrainment targeted towards motor-based treatment goals. Then there are the more mental health-focused groups in which I commonly facilitate primarily verbal processing-based song discussion experiences.

Furthermore, I made the assumption that the “musician” in this case is the one who approaches his or her work from an improvisational, performance-level stance. I don’t jam, I don’t gig, I don’t play professionally, and (although I do seek opportunities to nurture my musical self) I do not practice my music skills as much as I should. Given all this, I thought that surely I am the therapist who uses music.

But as I reflected, I realized this wasn’t entirely the case. I am not simply a “therapist who uses music.” Once I removed the assumption about what the “musician” looks like (improvisational, professional-style playing), I realized that there are plenty of times in which the musician in me is the one actively engaged, particularly in those situations in which I’m musically responsive and reflective in order to meet client needs moment-to-moment. For example, in my work with trauma-influenced children, the “therapist” in me emerged primarily to provide behavioral cues and prompts and to structure the environment for success. But the “real therapy” occurred through the music experiences in which the children and I were engaged. I wasn’t “using” music in these sessions, but rather facilitating experiences designed for musical engagement and connection.

So with my views shifting I wonder—does it have to be either-or? Do you have to be either the “therapist who uses music” or the “musician who does therapy”? Why can they not be context-dependent? There are clinical situations in which it may be more appropriate for me to approach the work primarily as a therapist, but others in which it’s more appropriate for me to be the musician first.

As I’m writing this post, I realize, too, that my personal preference is to be the musician first. The times in which I approach a session as a therapist first are based either on setting demands (either of the facility or the norms of a particular group) or are based on client preference (i.e., the client seems to want to talk and my role is to be the listener). But ultimately the music and the interactive music experience is where the real work happens and my role is the be its facilitator, to provide the opportunity for the client to engage, grow, and change.

Readers…what do you think? And how to you approach your work?

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

Jaclyn Sorenson, MTA, MT-BC, NMT July 23, 2015 at 9:13 am

Interesting perspective… in my opinion, what makes music such a powerful tool used in therapy is its ability to connect individuals from all walks of life. I use music in therapy to help clients reach their potential.

For myself, my focus is on the therapy I am providing and I am thinking from a scientific perspective of psychology/neuroanatomy/child development/etc. The musical aspects are then created in the moment, within the theraputic relationship with the client(s), for the purpose of working on non-musical goals.

Kimberly July 30, 2015 at 7:25 am

Thank you for sharing your thoughts, Jaclyn! My work, too, is very much grounded in science, but I am beginning to view the science as a way for us to understand how and why the music is effective. When it comes to working with the client, it’s through the music and music experience that change occurs. I imagine these musings will continue to evolve though…~Kimberly

Emily Keeling, MT-BC August 22, 2015 at 9:09 am

Hi, Kimberly!

This was a fascinating, stimulating, and complex post! Thanks so much for putting this out there. I am a new professional in my first year of clinical practice post board certification. I work in end-of-life care, and I think how I approach my work tends to be determined by the level of need my patients are experiencing at any given moment. I tend to mentally group the needs, goals, and interventions I encounter into a hierachery of physiological need, psychosocial need, and existential/spiritual needs. So for example, I am not going to be facilitating normalized family interaction at the bedside if my patient is having intense pain or anxiety. Nor am I going to engage my patient in a musical experience to help them connect to their higher power and ponder their existential questions if there are major, unmet psychosocial needs.
All of this to say, within my mental hierachery model for my clinical practice, I find that I tend to operate as musician first on the first and third levels of need and interaction, and as therapist first on the second (psychosocial) level.
If I am addressing a need such a pain reduction or respiratory comfort, I will approach that almost entirely musically. Talking about respiratory comfort isn’t going to be nearly as effective as using the iso principle and preferred music to reduce respiration rate. But lyric analysis and song dedication is going to have a bigger clinical impact on restoring a patient-caregiver dynamic to a husband-wife dynamic. I suppose now that I think about it, when I am addressing existential or spiritual concerns, it tends to be more music-centered, but the verbal processing is very important there too.

This has really gotten me thinking, and this week I was planning to tackle my own blog post on how there seems to be a false dichotomy between “musical” skills and “clinical” skills for a music therapist. I’d really love to hear your thoughts once I get that written!

Thanks again for your fabulous post. I’ll be pondering these questions as I return to seeing patients on Monday! 🙂

Luke Annesley September 2, 2015 at 5:07 am

Great to discover this blog! Very thoughtful and interesting and well written. I’ve not read Aigen’s book yet but immediately found the polarisation irritating, but perhaps it works better in context. I don’t even think it’s a choice between one or the other, rather that the question itself misses the point – of course we’re musicians first, otherwise we wouldn’t be ‘music therapists’ in the first place. I’ve blogged about this recently myself (see ‘The MT USP’ on jazztoad.blogspot.co.uk) and I think it’s a really important issue. Somehow we never quite seem to get to the bottom of it as a profession. Thanks so much for your thoughts.

Kimberly October 8, 2015 at 7:03 am

Hi Luke. Thank you so much for sharing YOUR thoughts! I hope you visit again 🙂 ~Kimberly

Kimberly October 8, 2015 at 7:04 am

Hi Emily! I really appreciate you sharing your thoughts. As you indicate, I feel much of this depends on context, and it will also evolve as we grow personally and professionally. Cheers ~Kimberly

Previous post:

Next post: